We want to have 65 percent renewables by 2030.
That has a conscious effect, but no steering effect. Take fuel prices as an example: I think a moderate increase through a CO2 tax would make sense, combined with an expansion of local public transport, for example. But we can’t make gasoline and diesel so expensive that certain groups can no longer afford to drive. On May 29, the climate cabinet will meet for the next time. What do you expect from the meeting?
It is imperative that a fixed timetable be drawn up as to which law will be drawn up and passed and when. It is not for nothing that we wrote in the coalition agreement that we want to pass climate protection legislation by 2019. This is exactly the point in time when we want to examine whether or not joining the grand coalition made sense – the so-called revision clause in the coalition agreement. I see both in a very, very close connection.
Surveys show that the topic of climate protection is at the top of the population. A grand coalition that wants to prove that it can shape the future and make it fit for the future must stick to this agreement. So far, I haven’t seen anything in the areas of mobility, buildings and agriculture; these are all Union-run departments, and we have to push ahead with the further expansion of renewable energies. We want to have 65 percent renewables by 2030.
That too has been blocked by large parts of the Union so far. I expect the Climate Cabinet to have a clear structure, an announcement by the Chancellor, so that we can still say in 2019: We have delivered. How important will climate policy be if the SPD takes stock of the GroKo? I think that is crucial Topic: Is this view generally shared in the SPD leadership? In the meantime, unlike among other party leaders, it is clear to everyone that climate protection is of crucial importance: for the preservation and creation of jobs and for maintaining social cohesion, globally and national. I believe that everyone at the top of the party gives this issue the highest priority. Would you advocate an end to the coalition if there is no climate protection legislation at the end of 2019? Everyone in the grand coalition must be aware that the expectations – especially in of the younger generation – it is huge for politics to clarify the big questions about the future. It is not for nothing that the SPD has enforced that the climate protection legislation in 2019 should ensure that the climate target 2030 is reached in Germany for the first time.
I am a positive person, so I have the firm hope that the coalition partners will stick to these crystal clear agreements. Anything else would be a massive loss of credibility that nobody can want. Hubertus VolmerQuelle: ntv.de spoke to Matthias Miersch: “Islam belongs to Germany, some say.application biology essay writing service Muslims perhaps, but by no means Islam, others oppose. A group of authors has this question just skipped it and devoted yourself to “” political Islam “”, with interesting results. Does Islam belong to Germany?
This question has been discussed for more than eight years – since the then Federal President Christian Wulff clearly affirmed this in a speech on the Day of German Unity. In addition to Christianity and Judaism, Islam “” now also belongs to Germany “”, he said. The crescent moon on the minaret of the Abubakr mosque in Frankfurt am Main. (Photo: picture alliance / dpa) Back then, in 2010, this sentence many, not least in Wulff’s party, the Union. He wasn’t the first to say something like that. “” Islam is part of Germany and Europe “”, today’s Bundestag President Wolfgang Schäuble had already declared in 2006 when he opened the first Islamic Conference in his role as Federal Minister of the Interior. Schäuble sticks to this statement until today.
He is the laudator at a book presentation, at which an anthology of around 260 pages is presented with the programmatic title “” Political Islam does not belong to Germany “”. One of the editors is the CDU member of the Bundestag Carsten Linnemann. In his introductory remarks, referring to the Wulff quote, he says: “” We don’t want to look in the rear-view mirror. “” The debate since then has “” gone in such a way that everyone is still in the trenches “”.
He politely suppresses the Schäuble quote; Schäuble doesn’t do that. “Muslims, and with them Islam, are part of Germany,” he says right away. From this sentence he had “” contrary to some assumptions, to take nothing back “”. Schäuble points out that political Islam is not problematic per se and that the Catholic Church also only clarified its relationship to democracy with the Second Vatican Council.
That was half a century ago, so “” not that terribly long “”. For Schäuble the central question is: “” How do we get Muslims to integrate their religious identity into the political framework of Germany? “” He sees this as a task for both Muslims and the non-Muslim section of German society: “” Integration challenges us all, it is a two-way street. “” Schäuble does not have a rule of thumb how that can be achieved. Teachers with headscarves, swimming lessons for girls, crosses in offices, the circumcision of boys – these are all conflicts that have to be renegotiated. However, he makes it clear: “” We only secure our social coexistence if we set and comply with rules. “” And he is optimistic that the task will be successful: “” I think we – Muslims and non-Muslims – must not let up in our efforts , but there are good reasons for us to be confident. “” Anyone who invites themselves to such a laudatory speech is not concerned with flatly condemning Islam. Indeed, the band is characterized by diversity. The authors who came to the book launch can’t even agree on what political Islam is.
The sociologist Ruud Koopmans says that a moderate political Islam analogous to Christian Democracy would not be a problem. One problem is Islamic fundamentalism, which in Europe “” extends into the middle of the Muslim communities. He sums it up as follows: “” Islam that actually exists does not belong to Germany. “” Sociologist Necla Kelek, who calls for a general headscarf ban for under 14-year-olds, on the other hand, says: “” There would be no political Islam with freedom for women . “” In her essay, she more or less equates “” politically simplified Islam “” with Islamism. There are also contrasts on other topics, such as how criticism of Islam is conveyed in the media. The journalist Andreas Schnadwinkel accuses the media in quite a sweeping blow of reporting “” misery “” or “timidly” “about political Islam. He only sees exceptions in the” “bourgeois daily newspapers” “, the FAZ and the” ” Welt “”, as well as the “” Bild “” newspaper. The former head of the ARD capital studio Joachim Wagner says that it is “” infinitely difficult to come up with provocative theses critical of Islam “” in the public media.
Sascha Adamek, who reported for the magazine “” Kontraste “” about the non-transparent financing of mosques in Germany, denies that. There may be a “” bite inhibition “” when it comes to integration, but about “” hard facts “” one could very well report and receive support. Michael Blume, the anti-Semitism commissioner of the state of Baden-Württemberg, finally points out that criticism of Islam is quite possible in the media – he reminds us of how much space the “mirror” was at the time Thilo Sarrazin have admitted. The problem is that this is a “” polar debate “”: for or against Islam. “” They can do one or the other wonderfully and are then cursed at.
But the middle is missing. “” It is also Blume who points to a statistical difficulty: he says somewhat exaggerated: “” If we were to determine the number of Christians in Germany in the same way as the number of Muslims, we would have 95 in one fell swoop Percent Christians in Saxony. “” (In fact, it is a good 22 percent.) In other words: Quite a few people with Muslim roots are so well integrated that they no longer appear in the statistics as Muslims. (One problem with the subject of Islam is that the number of Muslims in Germany is not so easy to determine because they are organized in a large number of associations.) This means that the many statistics that can easily be used to prove how democratically a large part are of Muslims living in Germany, there might be a catch. Anyone who thinks these contradictions are a disadvantage is wrong. On the contrary, the debate between the authors, who for the most part have formed a discussion group for years and who are quite of one opinion on the main points, shows that things are not always black or white. The central aim of the book is “” that differentiation is made, “” says Winfried Bausback, the book’s second editor. “And that liberal Muslims are supported and strengthened.” “This approach distinguishes the book strongly from a woodcut-like criticism of Islam. However, that does not mean that the authors want to allow fundamentalist Islam to do its thing in Germany. Bausback, for example, calls for a ban on “cultural discounts” in court judgments. This is also the first point in an “” Agenda against Political Islam “”, which forms the last chapter of the book.
Linnemann lists what the state can specifically do to combat Islamic fundamentalism and promote integration – including limiting the proportion of children with a migration background in school classes to 35 percent. The authors see the title of the book as a bridge between the irreconcilable Camp: between those who agree with Wulff and those who reject his sentence. In any case, Schäuble liked the band. “” I thought, well, take a look, “” he says. “” But then I read intensively. “” Source: ntv.de “Kramp-Karrenbauer was introduced to her new office with military honors. (Photo: REUTERS) The surprising appointment of CDU leader Kramp-Karrenbauer as the new defense minister comes along opposition politicians are not good at. They accuse the Union of power games and doubt that the Saarland woman has enough experience. The Left fears that the future Defense Minister Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer could lead to more foreign and war missions by the Bundeswehr. “” First She recently left the question unanswered as to whether German ground troops should take part in the war in Syria, which is contrary to international law, “” said party leader Bernd Riexinger in Berlin. In addition, as chairman of the CDU she has “” made a name for herself through wrong decisions and awkwardness “” Your profile in foreign and security policy is extremely vague, “” he said. “” How they put the rubble in order b that Ursula von der Leyen hands over to her with the Ministry of Defense is completely unclear. “” Riexinger pointed out that the takeover of the Ministry of Defense by Kramp-Karrenbauer had caused a surprise.
Two weeks ago she excluded any participation in the federal cabinet. “The question arises where this rapid change of heart came from.” “If the CDU leader now has to profile herself as Minister of Defense for the Chancellery,” “It looks bleak for the party and the ministry” “. The parliamentary group in the Bundestag, Jan Korte, accused the CDU of turning ministries “” into marshalling yards in order to regulate the Union’s weird personnel problems. “” He also criticized Kramp-Karrenbauer’s lack of experience. “In the Union you obviously never have to have had anything to do with the Ministry of Defense and the subject to become Minister of Defense.” “The FDP also criticized the appointment of the CDU chairwoman as the new defense minister. The Deputy Chief of the FDP parliamentary group, Alexander Graf Lambsdorff, spoke of an “” unreasonable demand for the troops and our NATO partners “” and a lack of “” respect “” for the Bundeswehr. “Nothing could express the Federal Chancellor’s disdain for the Bundeswehr more clearly than this persona,” explained Lambsdorff. Kramp-Karrenbauer has “” no “” experience in foreign or defense policy. FDP defense expert Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann told n-tv: “” The Bundeswehr is never suitable (…) as a playground for CDU internal power games. “” The Greens defense expert Agnieszka Brugger urged Kramp-Karrenbauer to focus more on the needs of Members of the Bundeswehr to enter. The new minister must “” pay more attention to taking the soldiers back with her, “said the deputy chairman of the Green parliamentary group. “” The Bundeswehr does not need jagged headlines and self-profiling, but solid and future-proof solutions. “” Above all, “” Abuses in the procurement area “” must be eliminated. Kramp-Karrenbauer inherits Ursula von der Leyen, who became the new EU Commission President yesterday had been chosen.
The CDU announced this decision on Tuesday evening after von der Leyens had been confirmed by the European Parliament – a big surprise. CDU leader Kramp-Karrenbauer had refused the position of the Ministry of Defense two weeks ago in an interview and referred to her work as party leader. For Kramp-Karrenbauer, the Ministry of Defense should be a test. The ministerial office is seen as a political ejection seat. Kramp-Karrenbauer’s predecessor von der Leyen suffered injuries there – for example in the consultant affair, the affair about the cost explosion in the renovation of the training ship “” Gorch Fock “” and through debates about material and equipment deficiencies. Federal Minister of Agriculture Julia Klöckner defended the personnel. “” Special circumstances require special decisions, “” said Klöckner in “” SWR Aktuell “” about the CDU boss, who received the certificate of appointment this morning.
Chancellor Angela Merkel and Kramp-Karrenbauer had wondered whether a big castling would make sense after leaving the Leyens: “” That probably doesn’t make it. “” Klöckner made it clear that she considered Kramp-Karrenbauer qualified: you “” was Prime Minister and had a lot to do with the German Armed Forces in Saarland. She was a country’s first female interior minister. In this respect: she knows her way around. “” CSU boss Markus Söder sees the nomination of the CDU boss as a clear strengthening of the federal government. “” This is a brave decision, but it is also a strong decision, “said Söder in Munich – even if the decision came as a surprise to some.